Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Comments:
<< Home
...and here we come again. :-)
Hi Markus,
I liked the 3rd part too. I'm tempted to write down all the words that you explain in each slide. I think I will obtain a sort of cheatsheet of the software architect.
Not that I believe in cheatsheets, but it could be useful (for me) in order to let these concepts migrate from a day-by-day vocabulary - and it's already a good result! - to a natural way of thinking.
About the "title contest" :-)
Maybe there is a mental association with your current title Unnamed, but I found most of the concepts, particularly when related to their samples, so valuable to obtain a good architecture that made me think of QWAN - Quality Without A Name.
Actually this could be true also for 1st and 2nd part, and even for all the remaining parts, but you could play with something like "Quality With Some Names", or give an on-the-road sense with "Towards a QWAN". Just my 2 cents.
Minor notes:
1. I agree in changing "Decentralization" in "Scalability". It's a more mainstream term.
2. You make me curious about Autosar, I'll look for some more information.
3. About the last slide: GUIDs stands for "Global Unique Identifiers", isn't it?
Ciao,
Umberto
Hi Markus,
I liked the 3rd part too. I'm tempted to write down all the words that you explain in each slide. I think I will obtain a sort of cheatsheet of the software architect.
Not that I believe in cheatsheets, but it could be useful (for me) in order to let these concepts migrate from a day-by-day vocabulary - and it's already a good result! - to a natural way of thinking.
About the "title contest" :-)
Maybe there is a mental association with your current title Unnamed, but I found most of the concepts, particularly when related to their samples, so valuable to obtain a good architecture that made me think of QWAN - Quality Without A Name.
Actually this could be true also for 1st and 2nd part, and even for all the remaining parts, but you could play with something like "Quality With Some Names", or give an on-the-road sense with "Towards a QWAN". Just my 2 cents.
Minor notes:
1. I agree in changing "Decentralization" in "Scalability". It's a more mainstream term.
2. You make me curious about Autosar, I'll look for some more information.
3. About the last slide: GUIDs stands for "Global Unique Identifiers", isn't it?
Ciao,
Umberto
> I liked the 3rd part too.
good :-)
> I'm tempted to write down all the words that you explain
> in each slide. I think I will obtain a sort of cheatsheet
> of the software architect.
I am sure I will write them down in some way, shape or form
at some time...
> About the "title contest" :-)
> Maybe there is a mental association with your current title Unnamed,
> but I found most of the concepts, particularly when related to their
> samples, so valuable to obtain a good architecture that made me think
> of QWAN - Quality Without A Name.
good idea -- I will think about it!
> Actually this could be true also for 1st and 2nd part, and even for
> all the remaining parts, but you could play with something like "Quality
> With Some Names", or give an on-the-road sense with "Towards a QWAN".
> Just my 2 cents.
I think this hint at the QWAN thing (I know the term from the patterns
world) is maybe something that's relevant for the overall presentation.
I will think about it!
> 3. About the last slide: GUIDs stands for "Global Unique Identifiers", isn't it?
yes -- resulting in a globally unique identity, right?
Markus
Post a Comment
good :-)
> I'm tempted to write down all the words that you explain
> in each slide. I think I will obtain a sort of cheatsheet
> of the software architect.
I am sure I will write them down in some way, shape or form
at some time...
> About the "title contest" :-)
> Maybe there is a mental association with your current title Unnamed,
> but I found most of the concepts, particularly when related to their
> samples, so valuable to obtain a good architecture that made me think
> of QWAN - Quality Without A Name.
good idea -- I will think about it!
> Actually this could be true also for 1st and 2nd part, and even for
> all the remaining parts, but you could play with something like "Quality
> With Some Names", or give an on-the-road sense with "Towards a QWAN".
> Just my 2 cents.
I think this hint at the QWAN thing (I know the term from the patterns
world) is maybe something that's relevant for the overall presentation.
I will think about it!
> 3. About the last slide: GUIDs stands for "Global Unique Identifiers", isn't it?
yes -- resulting in a globally unique identity, right?
Markus
<< Home