Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Architecture Fundamentals, Pt. 2
So, as promised recently, here's the second part of my the 6-part architecture fundamentals series of screencasts. It deals with "breaking things down" (in the sense of modularization, not destruction :-)).Keep the feedback coming! permalink
Comments:
<< Home
Hi Markus,
first of all thank you for the time spent in creating an interesting screencast that is also aestethically pleasing.
Contents: I expected something more deep, or more "hands-on". But maybe the problem is mine, as long as the series is centered on *fundamentals*. Moreover, there are 4 more episodes, so I think I just have to be a little patient.
In any case, I found the episode valuable as it is a good overview of the aspects that should be taken into account when starting to think of a software architecture.
Sound: same annoyance of Part 1. Don't know if you are looking for alternatives. I tried Camstudio (http://camstudio.org/; for a portable version I like http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.726): it was just a little try, but the audio was correct. Further, it's GPL.
first of all thank you for the time spent in creating an interesting screencast that is also aestethically pleasing.
Contents: I expected something more deep, or more "hands-on". But maybe the problem is mine, as long as the series is centered on *fundamentals*. Moreover, there are 4 more episodes, so I think I just have to be a little patient.
In any case, I found the episode valuable as it is a good overview of the aspects that should be taken into account when starting to think of a software architecture.
Sound: same annoyance of Part 1. Don't know if you are looking for alternatives. I tried Camstudio (http://camstudio.org/; for a portable version I like http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.726): it was just a little try, but the audio was correct. Further, it's GPL.
Hi Umberto,
> Contents: I expected something
> more deep, or more "hands-on".
so did I :-)
But I didn't have the time yet. I am actually planning on adding more details sometime in the future.
> Moreover, there are 4 more
> episodes, so I think I just have
> to be a little patient.
right. But they are not necessarily more "hands on".
> In any case, I found the episode
> valuable as it is a good
> overview of the aspects that
> should be taken into account
> when starting to think of a
> software architecture.
yes, that's the idea.
> Sound: same annoyance of Part 1.
yes, same tool, same annoyance :-)
> Don't know if you are looking
> for alternatives.
yes, but not for the other parts. They are already recorded :-(
Thanks for your input!
Markus
> Contents: I expected something
> more deep, or more "hands-on".
so did I :-)
But I didn't have the time yet. I am actually planning on adding more details sometime in the future.
> Moreover, there are 4 more
> episodes, so I think I just have
> to be a little patient.
right. But they are not necessarily more "hands on".
> In any case, I found the episode
> valuable as it is a good
> overview of the aspects that
> should be taken into account
> when starting to think of a
> software architecture.
yes, that's the idea.
> Sound: same annoyance of Part 1.
yes, same tool, same annoyance :-)
> Don't know if you are looking
> for alternatives.
yes, but not for the other parts. They are already recorded :-(
Thanks for your input!
Markus
Hi Markus,
I found your slides entitled "MDSD and Component based development" while surfing into se-radio.net. Maybe that's the kind of "hands-on" I had in mind.
My quest will be complete when I will open my wallet and buy some kind-of-iPod to start listening the podcast (this episode and obviously all the others!) :-)
Just a small note: I found the text "! Modularize" something of counter-intuitive, because it made me think: "this topic is aimed to NOT modularize."
But be aware of the fact that I'm deeply C/C++ influenced.
Thank you again,
Umberto
Post a Comment
I found your slides entitled "MDSD and Component based development" while surfing into se-radio.net. Maybe that's the kind of "hands-on" I had in mind.
My quest will be complete when I will open my wallet and buy some kind-of-iPod to start listening the podcast (this episode and obviously all the others!) :-)
Just a small note: I found the text "! Modularize" something of counter-intuitive, because it made me think: "this topic is aimed to NOT modularize."
But be aware of the fact that I'm deeply C/C++ influenced.
Thank you again,
Umberto
<< Home